Case	Judge	Motion	Ruling	Hearing

Shasta County Superior Court Tentative Rulings · DecisionDepot

All counties

Shasta County

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

855 rulings ingested. Browse all Shasta County tentative rulings →

Shasta Online Services

Filter & search

Earliest indexed

Jun 6, 2022

Most recent

Jul 6, 2026

Calendar days

Status

Active

Jun 2022 – Jul 6, 2026 · 855 rulings. This court actively publishes tentative rulings; the most recent one was posted -1 days ago.

Divisions indexed(2 total — click to filter)

Probate (557)Civil (298)

Divisions not listed above (typically Criminal, Small Claims, Traffic) are not posted as tentative rulings by this court and are not searchable here.

Case	Division	Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing
198561 Lumgair v. Lumgair	Civil	Unknown	Status conference regarding financial issues	CONTINUED	Jun 29, 2026	Jun 6, 2022
198133 Putnam v. McDonald	Civil	Unknown	Request for order	CONTINUED	Jun 29, 2026	Jun 6, 2022
199323 Stefani v. Stefani	Civil

Browse all 855 Shasta County rulings →

Frequently asked questions

Where can I find Shasta County Superior Court tentative rulings?+

DecisionDepot indexes Shasta County Superior Court tentative rulings for free — no login required. We currently have 855 tentative rulings from Shasta County indexed. Use the search and filter tools on this page to browse by judge, motion type, hearing date, and ruling outcome. The official court portal is also available at https://www.shasta.courts.ca.gov/online-services.

What is a tentative ruling in Shasta California Superior Court?+

A tentative ruling is a preliminary decision issued by a Shasta Superior Court judge before the scheduled hearing. Under California Rules of Court, the court posts tentative rulings the afternoon before the hearing date. Parties who wish to contest the ruling must provide timely notice; if no party contests, the tentative ruling becomes the final order. Tentative rulings let attorneys predict the likely outcome and decide whether oral argument is warranted.