DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PC-0033342·shasta·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

CONSERVATORSHIP OF BILLY TURNBULL

Petition for Appointment of a Conservator of the Person and Estate

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 6, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherBilly Turnbull

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PC-0033342 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Appointment of a Conservator of the Person and Estate. Letters of Temporary Conservatorship issued on May 4, 2026, and are set to expire today unless further extended. The matter has not been properly noticed. There is no proof of service for the Conservatee’s son and insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice. The Citation has been filed with proper proof of service. Counsel has not been appointed for the Conservatee.

The Court appoints the Public Defender as counsel for the Conservatee. The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on May 7, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. The report states that the Conservatee will not attend the hearing. The matter is continued to Monday, July 6, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings on the Petition for Appointment of Conservator of the Person and Estate and confirmation of counsel. The Temporary Conservatorship is ORDERED to remain in effect until the continued hearing date.

Petitioner is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on all parties entitled to notice. Duties of Conservator (form GC-348) is required to be filed. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF NAYOMI VICKERY

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share