DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PC-0033375·shasta·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MARK GILLIGAN

Petition for Appointment of a Conservator of the Person and Estate

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 3, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PC-0033375 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Appointment of a Conservator of the Person and Estate. Temporary Letters of Conservatorship issued to Petitioners on May 11, 2026, and are set to expire today unless further extended. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. The Citation has not been filed with proper proof of service. No Duties of Conservator (GC-348) has been filed. No Capacity Declaration has been filed. Counsel has been appointed for the Conservatee.

The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on June 22, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. The report states that the Conservatee will not attend the hearing but contests the conservatorship. The matter is continued to Monday, August 3, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings on the Petition for Appointment of Conservator of the Person and Estate. The Temporary Conservatorship is ORDERED to remain in effect until the continued hearing date. Petitioner is required to have a new Citation issued for the continued hearing date and have it served on the Conservatee. Proof of service of the Citation is required to be filed. Additionally, Duties of Conservator and a Capacity Declaration are required to be filed. Notice is preserved. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF JAMES JONES

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share