The Learning Light Foundation, Inc. vs. City of Anaheim
Motion to continue trial; Motions to be relieved as counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
The court continues the OSC re: dismissal on settled case from 6/8/26 to 7/20/26. Once the fees are paid, plaintiff shall file a request for dismissal with prejudice at least 5 court days before the next hearing to take the matter off calendar.
Plaintiff shall give notice.
305 The Learning Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Learning Light Light Foundation, Inc.’s motion to continue trial is Foundation, Inc. DENIED. vs. City of Anaheim While Cross-Defendant contends a trial continuance is necessary due to the unavailability of counsel Ernie Zachary Park (Park), Cross- Defendant has since filed a substitution of attorney replacing Park with new counsel. (ROA 352.) The motion is therefore moot.
The motions to be relieved as counsel set fir 8/24/26 and 8/31/26 are vacated as MOOT given the recent substitutions of counsel. (ROA 352, 353.)
Cross-Complainant shall give notice.
306 Rodriguez vs. The Motion to Vacate Judgment, etc., filed on Parker 2/19/26 by Plaintiff Steven Lee Rodriguez (Plaintiff), is DENIED.
The Motion was not properly served on counsel for Defendant Nili N. Alai, M.D. Inc. (Alai). As of 2/18/26, new counsel had substituted in for Alai, yet Plaintiff served only Alai’s prior counsel.
The Motion also exceeds the 15-page limit (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(d)), and cites to unpublished authority in violation of court rules (California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a)).
The Motion also fails as the Opposition has presented evidence to show that although the
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”