NGUYEN vs NGUYEN BINH KHIEM, LLC, et al.

24CV015755: NGUYEN vs NGUYEN BINH KHIEM, LLC, et al. 07/24/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A

Tentative Ruling

NOTICE:

*** If oral arguments are requested or appearances are required, the hearing may be conducted in person or remotely via ZoomGov, which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options. No Court Call appearances will be permitted. If you choose to use Zoom you must use your first and last name on your ZoomGov account so the court can positively identify you. The Department 17A ZoomLink is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16173813009 and the ZoomGov ID is: 161 7381 3009. Appearances via videoconference using the above link are preferred. To appear on ZoomGov by phone, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the ZoomGov ID referenced above, available phone commands include *6 to mute/unmute or *9 to raise your hand. If you experience issues joining your hearing, please contact the clerk in Department 17A at (916) 874- 5487 for assistance.

Please take notice that effective April 13, 2026, the Presiding Judge Law & Motion calendar has been moved to Department 17A at the Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse, the Honorable Lawrence G. Brown presiding. The new courthouse is located at 500 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Hon. Lawrence G. Brown Department 17A 916-874-5487 dept17A@saccourt.ca.gov ***

TENTATIVE RULING:

The Notice of Motion provides inaccurate information regarding the Court’s tentative ruling system. The Court’s tentative ruling system for the Law and Motion calendar in the Presiding Judge’s department is governed by Local Rule 1.05(C)-(D). Moving counsel is directed to contact opposing counsel and/or self-represented litigants and advise them of the correct local rule, the correct tentative ruling procedure, and the manner to request a hearing for motions pending in this department.

Defendants Chinatown, LLC and Thai Du’s (“Moving Defendants”) motion to continue trial is unopposed and GRANTED.

The Court finds good cause for continuance based on the lack of opposition, the agreement of

24CV015755: NGUYEN vs NGUYEN BINH KHIEM, LLC, et al. 07/24/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A

Plaintiff’s counsel, to allow additional time for Moving Defendants’ new counsel retained by its insurance carrier to get up to speed in the action, and based upon consideration of the factors set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332.

The September 15, 2026 trial date is VACATED. The Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) scheduled for July 30, 2026, shall remain on calendar as requested.

Moving Defendants request a new trial date of February 15, 2027. However, the non-moving defendants failed to comply with Local Rule 2.11, which requires all parties to provide their availability for trial when a motion to continue trial is pending, regardless of whether the motion is opposed.

Accordingly, the case is referred to the Trial Setting Process for selection of trial and MSC dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon three (3) trial and three (3) MSC dates. Available dates can be obtained on the Court’s web site at https://services.saccourt.ca.gov/PublicCourtApplications/Civil/TrialSettingProcess/.

Plaintiff shall promptly utilize the online submission form on the above website to submit the parties’ preferred dates to the Court. The Court will review the submitted dates and from those, select one MSC and one trial date. The Court will provide email confirmation of the confirmed dates to the party that submitted the online form.

If the parties have not agreed on dates and/or otherwise fail to submit their agreed upon dates to the Court on or before the 60th day after the date of the Court’s referral order, court staff shall assign MSC and trial dates that are next available, unless an extension of time has been granted by the appropriate Civil Home Court Department.

Upon receiving email confirmation from the Court confirming the calendared MSC and trial dates, Plaintiff shall file and serve notice of such dates, times, and departments to all parties. The Court will provide notice to the parties only in the instance where the Court has selected dates due to the failure of the parties to submit their preferred dates in a timely manner.

All deadlines, including discovery and expert discovery, shall be governed by the new trial date.

This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1019.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1312.)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

24CV015755: NGUYEN vs NGUYEN BINH KHIEM, LLC, et al. 07/24/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A

*** This case has been assigned to Department 17A for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 17A. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 12:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If a proper request for hearing is not made, this shall become the order of the Court.

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code section 68086 and California Rules of Court, rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided. ***