DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025-01450476·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoMotion by Hoan N. Nguyen denied as moot; Motion by Richard Kwak, Esq. granted.

Nguyen v. Lucatero

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen (Hoan N. Nguyen); Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen (Richard Kwak, Esq.)

Hearing date
Jun 22, 2026
Department
C28
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMai T. Nguyen

Attorneys

Hoan N. Nguyen(Wow Law Group, APC)for Plaintiff
Bobbi Bolton(Pacific Coast Injury Law Center)for Plaintiff
Richard Kwak(Pacific Coast Injury Law Center)for Plaintiff

Ruling

# Case Name Tentative

50. Nguyen v. Attorney Hoan N. Nguyen of Wow Law Group, APC’s Lucatero Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen 2025- 01450476 Attorney Hoan N. Nguyen of Wow Law Group, APC’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen is DENIED as MOOT.

A substitution of attorney has been filed indicating that Plaintiff has consented to the substitution of Bobbi Bolton, Esq. of Pacific Coast Injury Law Center for Hoan N. Nguyen of Wow Law Group, APC as Plaintiff’s counsel of record. (ROA 64.)

Attorney Richard Kwak, Esq. of Pacific Coast Injury Law Center’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen

Attorney Richard Kwak, Esq. of Pacific Coast Injury Law Center’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen is GRANTED.

Service on Plaintiff and counsel of the other parties was proper, and all required forms were filed pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362.

Accordingly, Richard Kwak, Esq. and Pacific Coast Injury Law Center are relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen.

The order will take effect once moving attorney files proof of service of this Order on Plaintiff Mai T. Nguyen.

Moving attorney to provide notice of this ruling.

51. Brown v. Defendant City of Newport Beach’s demurrer to Plaintiff Craig City of Brown’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) is SUSTAINED. Newport (Code Civ. Proc. §430.10, subd. (e).) Beach Defendant renews its demurrer to Plaintiff’s Third Cause of 2025- Action for Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation, 01476699 which the court previously found to be inadequately pleaded. (ROA 51.) Plaintiff’s SAC added paragraph 81, which reads: “Plaintiff requested, as a reasonable accommodation (and per Defendant’s mandated duty to investigate) and in order for Plaintiff to return to workplace free from retaliation and harassment, that Defendant conduct an investigation related to his disclosures of unlawful conduct. Plaintiff also requested, as a reasonable accommodation, that he be reassigned to a

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share