BORGES vs A.B. BOYD CO., et al.
Ex Parte Application for an order permitting OEE to file a longer memorandum
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
24CV090237: BORGES vs A.B. BOYD CO., et al. 06/11/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application for an order permitting OEE to file a longer memorandum to pursuant California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1113(e) CRS# A-90237-003 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 06/10/2026 Patrick McKinney
The parties are to appear. Defendant's application does not specify the length of the brief Defendant intends to submit in support of its motion for summary judgment/adjudication. The application does not present unusually complicated circumstances (Application at 5:4-14; Joyce Decl. para. 10:9-16), but the court may be inclined to permit an opening brief slightly in excess of the 20-page limit.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”