DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV162809·alameda·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 10 days agoGRANTED

MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al.

Ex Parte Application for permission to file a memorandum longer than fifteen pages

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMENOR
DefendantCHANEL, INC.
DefendantMerck & Co., Inc.

Ruling

26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/14/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application Plaintiffs will apply ex parte, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(e), for permission to file a memorandum longer than fifteen pages in opposition CRS# A-162809-052 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/13/2026 Patrick McKinney

Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to File an Opposition Memorandum to former Defendant Merck & Co., Inc.'s Motion to Compel Genetic Testing in Excess of Fifteen Pages is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file an opposition that does not exceed 25 pages.

Plaintiffs' counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling may do so at the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share