B-Line Construction, Inc. vs Wen Lung Chow

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: June 4, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS LINE 3 24CV447980 Jeremy Williams Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication vs Ford Motor Scroll down to Line 3 for Tentative Ruling. Company et al

LINE 4 23CV417149 B-Line Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Construction, Inc. Special Interrogatories, Request for Admissions, and Request for vs Wen Lung Production of Documents, Set One; and Sanctions. Chow OFF CALENDAR, moving party WITHDREW the motion on June 1, 2026. On August 19, 2025, Plaintiff B-Line Construction, Inc. filed this motion to compel defendant Wen Lung Chow to provide—further responses to 142 separate discovery—form interrogoatires, special interrogatories, request for admission, and request for production of documents, including: 23 further responses to form interrogatories (Nos. 304.1, 305.1, 305.5, 305.6, 305.8, 305.11, 305.12, 309.1, 309.2, 311.1, 311.2, 312.1, 313.1, 313.2, 314.1, 314.2, 314.3, 314.4; 314.5, 314.6, 324.1, 325.1, and 326.1); 59 responses to special interrogatories (Nos. 1- 59); 17 further responses to request for admissions (Nos. 1-10, and 14- 20); and 43 further responses to request for production of documents (Nos. 1-43).

Given the complexity and extensive discovery motions, the Court will discuss having future discovery motions assigned to a discovery referee under Code of Civil Procedure section 639 and 645.1. Parties to appear.

The matter is unopposed. Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b) opposition papers were due on May 21, 2026. A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to the granting of the motion. California Rule of Court Rule 8.54c. Failure to oppose a motion leads to the presumption that the plaintiff has no meritorious arguments. (Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 481, 489).

5