DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF26519652·sf·Civil·Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC VS. MARK ROSENBERG

Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award And Enter Judgment Thereon

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC
RespondentMARK ROSENBERG

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, June 03, 2026, Line 3. Petitioner Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC'S unopposed Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award And Enter Judgment Thereon is GRANTED.

Good cause appearing, the Petition to Confirm the Arbitrators' Award is granted and the arbitration award is confirmed in its entirety and Judgment shall be entered consistent with the Award, including an order to expunge from Robert N. Newman's Central Registration Depository ("CRD") records (CRD # 4237176) all references to the FINRA Arbitration and Occurrence Number 2260172.

Petitioner is ordered to prepare a proposed order consistent with the above and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share