DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23609947·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

SILVIA BRISTOL ET AL VS. MCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 14, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSILVIA BRISTOL
DefendantMCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC
DefendantPONTAR REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23609947 - May 27, 2026 Hearing date: May 27, 2026 Case number: CGC23609947 Case title: SILVIA BRISTOL ET AL VS. MCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23609947 | Case Title: | | SILVIA BRISTOL ET AL VS. MCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 27, 2026. Line 1.

DEFENDANT MCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC, PONTAR REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication is CONTINUED to July 14, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share