DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24615091·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

SUSAN BOONE VS. ANGELA Y. CHEER ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative For Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Apr 8, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 5, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSUSAN BOONE
DefendantANGELA Y. CHEER
DefendantTAKAKUWA CHEER REVOCABLE TRUST
DefendantLUCAS DANG
DefendantGENEVIEVE CHEER-DANG
DefendantJEFFERY CHEER

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 8, 2026. Line 3. DEFENDANT ANGELA CHEER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE TAKAKUWA CHEER REVOCABLE TRUST, LUCAS DANG, GENEVIEVE CHEER-DANG, JEFFERY CHEER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative For Summary Adjudication is continued to May 5, 2026 for moving and opposing party to provide properly tabbed courtesy copies of their respective filings in support of and in opposition no later than April 17, 2026 with cover letters letter reflecting new hearing date.

Untabbed copies may be picked up from department 501. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share