In the Matter of: Jeffrey Macomber, CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Order to Show Cause why lien or encumbrance should not be stricken and released
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
26CV011781: IN THE MATTER OF: JEFFREY MACOMBER, CA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 09/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: re: Why Lien or Encumbrance ShouldNot Be Stricken and Released in Department 16C
Tentative Ruling
Petitioner Jeffrey Macomber (Petitioner) filed his petition for an order to show cause (OSC) why the lien or encumbrance should not be stricken and released on May 7, 2026. The Court issued an OSC setting the hearing for todays date, and ordering Respondent Ayana Denzmore (Respondent) to give any legal reason that the lien or other encumbrance on the property of the public officer or employee described in the attached petition should not be stricken and the other relief requested in the petition should not be granted. (Order to Show Cause, June 1, 2026.)
This petition arises from a UCC Financing Statement No. U250131846931, filed with the California Secretary of State by Respondent on May 5, 2025. This UCC Financing Statement states:
This is actual and constructive notice of acceptance and claim by Ayanna Manaa Denzmore, Trustee of the AYANNA DENZMORE LIVING ESTATE TRUST ('A-TRUST'), as it relates to the trust res known as ABRAHAM EZEKIEL BANKS (Ens Legis/Trust Estate). This UCC Financing Statement supplements and supports the original perfected filing in the State of New York under Filing No. 202504268204854, which remains active and unrebutted in the public record. This California filing exists to notice ministerial officers and agencies within the State of California of said perfected interest and enforce recognition of said trust property within California jurisdiction.
The collateral secured includes, but is not limited to: all legal and equitable titles, DNA, biological property, cell lines, retina scans, fingerprints, commercial energy, instruments, contracts, administrative proceedings, securities, accounts, and entitlements linked to the person, estate, or derivatives of the name ABRAHAM EZEKIEL BANKS, as cited in Case No. 02F01274 and other related proceedings. Trustee Ayanna Manaa Denzmore, in her fiduciary capacity, accepted and tendered lawful settlement on May 2, 2025, by delivery of a duly executed International Bill of Exchange (IBOE), in accordance with the commercial remedy available through equity and public trust law.
Said tender constitutes substance-over-form discharge, not private credit or fiat currency. This filing is made in good faith, not for unlawful or fraudulent purpose, and functions as notice of private trust administration, claim of right, and commercial closure under Lex Mercatoria and UCC §§ 1-308, 1-103, 3-104, 9-102. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury (or successor), is noticed and accepted as fiduciary steward over any residual res and collateral for the final adjustment and closure of related accounts and obligations.
No corporate fiction or agency relationship is acknowledged or joined herein. The living man Abraham Ezekiel Banks is not the party subject to controversy. This
26CV011781: IN THE MATTER OF: JEFFREY MACOMBER, CA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 09/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: re: Why Lien or Encumbrance ShouldNot Be Stricken and Released in Department 16C
record stands as part of lawful administration of trust property. All rights reserved, without prejudice. Trustee: Ayanna Manaa Denzmore, by Special Appointment.
(Pet., Exh. A.)
Petitioner is the Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). (Macomber Decl., ¶ 1.) Petitioner declares that there is, in fact, no security agreement, settlement, commercial transaction, contractual or other relationship that would give the respondent a security interest or lien against my assets or property. Any claim in this UCC Financing Statement against me by this respondent is false. I am also unaware of any type of agreement that would give the respondent any type of security interest or lien against CDCR. (Id., ¶ 2.)
Petitioners unopposed request for judicial notice is granted. In taking judicial notice of these documents, the court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (See Professional Engineers v. Dept of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590; Steed v. Department of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120-121.)
Code of Civil Procedure section 765.010 provides, in relevant part:
(b) A person shall not file or record, or direct another to file or record, a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance, including a notice of lis pendens, against another person or entity knowing it is false, with the intent to harass the person or entity or to influence or hinder the person in discharging his or her official duties if the person is a public officer or employee.
(c)(1) A person or entity whose property is subject to a lien or encumbrance in violation of this section may petition the superior court of the county in which the person or entity resides or in which the property is located for an order, which may be granted ex parte, directing the lien or other encumbrance claimant to appear at a hearing before the court and show cause why the lien or other encumbrance should not be stricken and other relief provided by this article should not be granted.
(2) The court shall schedule the hearing no earlier than 14 days after the date of the order. The scheduled date of the hearing shall allow adequate time for notice of the hearing.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 765.010, subds. (b)(c).) If the court determines the lien or encumbrance
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
26CV011781: IN THE MATTER OF: JEFFREY MACOMBER, CA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 09/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: re: Why Lien or Encumbrance ShouldNot Be Stricken and Released in Department 16C
violates Section 765.010, subdivision (b), the court must issue an order striking and releasing the lien. (Id., § 765.030.) Furthermore, the court may award attorneys fees and must award a civil penalty of up to $5,000. (Id., §§ 765.030, 765.040.)
Having failed to file a response to the OSC, Respondent fails to give any legal reason that the lien or other encumbrance on the property of the public officer or employee described in the attached petition should not be stricken and the other relief requested in the petition should not be granted.
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the petition and orders UCC Financing Statement No. U250131846931, on May 5, 2025, is ordered stricken.
Petitioners request that a $5,000 penalty be awarded against Respondent is GRANTED.
Petitioners request for attorneys fees and costs is DENIED. Petitioner fails to set forth the amount of attorneys fees requested or any information to substantiate the fees.
Petitioner shall prepare an order for the Court's signature pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1312.
NOTICE:
Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure:
To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Department 16C Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-1475 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message: a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing party may appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below.
If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court. Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by video conference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court will presume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings.
The Department 16C Zoom Link is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16030877014 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 160 3087 7014. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
26CV011781: IN THE MATTER OF: JEFFREY MACOMBER, CA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 09/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: re: Why Lien or Encumbrance ShouldNot Be Stricken and Released in Department 16C
enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALL APPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed on the Court Reporter Services webpage available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://saccourt.ca.gov/general-information/court-reporter-services-transcripts. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://saccourt.ca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/227/639084034465370000.
A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list.
Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”