| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Request For Dismissal Without Prejudice Of The Class Action Complaint In Its Entirety As To Defendant 1330 Jones Street Llc Only
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC24616526 - December 16, 2025 Hearing date: December 16, 2025 Case number: CGC24616526 Case title: LANCE CUNNINGHAM VS. THE CITISCAPE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24616526 | Case Title: | | LANCE CUNNINGHAM VS. THE CITISCAPE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC ET AL |
Court Date: | | 2025-12-16 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Request For Dismissal Without Prejudice Of The Class Action Complaint In Its Entirety As To Defendant 1330 Jones Street Llc Only; Declaration Of Jaime Castaneda In Support Thereof | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for Tuesday, December 16, 2025, Line 3, PLAINTIFF LANCE CUNNINGHAM, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHER MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC SIMILARLY SITUATED Request For Dismissal Without Prejudice Of The Class Action Complaint In Its Entirety As To Defendant 1330 Jones Street Llc Only.
Plaintiff Lance Cunningham's unopposed Request For Dismissal Without Prejudice Of The Class Action Complaint In Its Entirety As To Defendant 1330 Jones Street LLC Only is GRANTED AND THE COURT ISSUES RELATED ORDERS. Good cause appearing and consistent with California Rules of Court, rule 3.770, the court orders that Plaintiff may dismiss without prejudice the class action claims in their entirety only as to Defendant 1330 Jones Street LLC. The record demonstrates that dismissal will not prejudice class members, thus no notice to the class is required. Plaintiff must file a request for dismissal on the Judicial Council form and should include a copy of this order with that submission.
The parties are advised that the court understands this case to be complex under CRC 3.400 et seq, yet the parties have not yet applied for complex designation. The court orders the parties forthwith to meet and confer regarding complex designation and pursue complex designation under California Rules of Court, rule 3.403(b) and San Francisco Local Rule, rule 3.5(C)(2)&(3). If any motion is noticed for this department in the future, the parties must file a joint statement regarding the status of complex designation at the time the motion is filed.
Moving Party must prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |