[ Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Court Trial
Motion type
Ruling
in Ajo, Arizona is a valid current address for Defendant because on August 12, 2026, Plaintiff filed a different proof of service indicating service of the moving papers by mail from Mesa, Arizona to an address for Defendant in Gustine, California. A noticed motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 685.080 must be served in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 (see Code Civ. Proc., § 1005(a)(13), Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1300(a)). In this case, if Defendant currently resides in Gustine, the notice of motion and motion served by mail from a location outside California on August 12, 2026, were served less than the minimum required 16 court days plus ten calendar days when mailed from a place outside the State of California (see Code Civ. Proc., § 1005(b)).
25CV-00156 Cavalry SPV I, LLC vs. Laura Vargas
Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Requests for Admission
The unopposed motion by plaintiff Cavalry SPV I, LLC, for an order deeming admitted the truth of any matters specified in plaintiff’s Requests for Admission, Set One, served on defendant Laura Vargas is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) It is undisputed that Defendant has not served a response to the requests for admissions. The Court notes that Plaintiff has not requested monetary sanctions.
The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the moving papers.
26CV-01432 Keith Bradshaw vs. Latasha Perez
Order to Appear for Examination (Small Claims) – Latasha Perez
Appearance required.
26CV-01824 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. Cecilia Soto
Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Requests for Admission
The unopposed motion by plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., for an order deeming admitted the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in plaintiff’s Requests for Admission, Set One, served on defendant Cecilia Soto is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) It is undisputed that Defendant has not served a response to the requests for admissions. The Court notes that Plaintiff has not requested monetary sanctions.
The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the moving papers.
26CV-02080 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Appearance required.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”