DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-02479·merced·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoAppearance required

[ Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
Courtroom 9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED

Limited Civil Commissioner David Foster Courtroom 9

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Monday, June 29, 2026 1:30 p.m.

Case No. Title / Description

23CV-01330 Capital One, N.A. vs. Demetrice George

Motion to Set Aside & Vacate Default Judgment; Request to Dismiss Complaint

Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to set aside the default, vacate the default judgment and dismiss the action without prejudice is GRANTED pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(d). The Court will sign proposed order submitted with the moving papers.

26CV-01359 Jesus Maldonado vs. Sofia Perez

Motion to Vacate Judgment (Small Claims)

Appearance required.

26CV-02479 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required. The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your inten t to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share