DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV0505·eldorado·Civil·Attorney Withdrawal
Hearing 10 days agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

CAPITAL ONE N.A. VS. LINDA F RIDDLE

ATTORNEY WITHDRAWAL

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCapital One N.A.
DefendantLinda F. Riddle

Ruling

August 14, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

9. 25CV0505 CAPITAL ONE N.A. VS. LINDA F RIDDLE ATTORNEY WITHDRAWAL

ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION DUE TO LACK OF JUDICIAL COVERAGE, THE COURT WILL HEAR THIS MATTER ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT NINE. THERE WILL BE NO HEARING ON AUGUST 14, 2026. SHOULD A PARTY WISH TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, THE BELOW PROCEDURES REMAIN IN EFFECT.

Counsel for Defendant, Linda F. Riddle, has filed a motion to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 284(2) and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362. A declaration on Judicial Council Form MC-052 accompanies the motion, as required by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, stating that the client has dropped from the program. Counsel has not indicated whether a next hearing or trial have been set.

Code of Civil Procedure § 284(2) and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362 allow an attorney to withdraw after notice to the client. California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(d) requires confirmation of the client’s mailing address within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved. Counsel has indicated the client was served by mail but has not provided confirmation of the client’s current mailing address as required, rendering service defective. The Findings and Order sections in Counsel’s proposed Order are incomplete as required by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e).

TENTATIVE RULING #9: DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL’S MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR DEFECTIVE SERVICE.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999).

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.

LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG

August 14, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.

34

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share