DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26680938·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 11 days agoDENIED without prejudice.

BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. CEDRIC M. FALL

Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for Terminating Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY
DefendantCEDRIC M. FALL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26680938 - August 13, 2026 Hearing date: August 13, 2026 Case number: CUD26680938 Case title: BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. CEDRIC M. FALL Case Number: | | CUD26680938 | Case Title: | | BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. CEDRIC M. FALL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Plaintiff'S Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions Against Defendant Cedric M. Fall | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 13, 2026. Line 11.

PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY Plaintiff'S Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions Against Defendant Cedric M. Fall is DENIED without prejudice. No foundation for the statements in the declaration of Plaintiff's counsel that Defendant has not served discovery responses.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share