CORDELL vs PATELCO CREDIT UNION
Compliance Hearing
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
24CV082095: CORDELL vs PATELCO CREDIT UNION 08/12/2026 Compliance Hearing in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 08/10/2026 Patrick McKinney
The pro hac vice admission of Michael N. Pollack representing Plaintiff is not renewed. To avoid a lapse of admission status, counsel may submit proof that the renewal fee was paid before the hearing.
The Compliance Hearing scheduled for 08/12/2026 is vacated.
Plaintiff's counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.
CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: If the parties do not contest the Tentative Case Management Order, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative case management order must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”