Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Aside Defualt Judgmnet, Recall/Quash Writ Of Possession, Resroting Defendant Into Possession Of The Premises
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 30, 2026. Line 14. DEFENDANT JACLYN OVERSTREET (SUED ERRONEOUSLY AS JACLYN JOYAHARA) Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Aside Defualt Judgmnet, Recall/Quash Writ Of Possession, Resroting Defendant Into Possession Of The Premises is GRANTED in part.
Default and default judgment entered on January 12, 2026 are set aside and vacated pursuant to CCP 473(b).
Request to vacate/recall writ of possession is MOOT. The writ has already been executed and was returned fully satisfied on February 24, 2026, so there is no active writ to vacate or recall.
Request to restore Defendant to possession is DENIED. As the writ was already executed, possession is no longer at issue in this unlawful detainer action; Defendant does not provide any authority or explain by what mechanism this relief can be accomplished in this action at this stage.
Plaintiff's opposition is stricken as there is no proof of service of the opposition on file. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”