DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
UD-26-000408·stanislaus·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoHEARING REQUIRED

ARCHWAY EAH LL LP vs MORALES, MARICELA

Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default & Default Judgment

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffARCHWAY EAH LL LP
DefendantMARICELA MORALES

Ruling

The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sony S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-23-006729 - LUSBY, KARI vs YOUNG, CARTER - a) Defendant's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Seven, to Kari Lusby - WITHDRAWN by moving party. b) Defendant's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Six, to Kari Lusby - WITHDRAWN by moving party. a-b) WITHDRAWN by moving party. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Commissioner Jared D.

Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: UD-26-000275 - JAUREGUI, GUADALUPE vs ESQUIVEL, ANA ALICIA RUIZ - Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default & Default Judgment - HEARING REQUIRED. UD-26-000276 - JAUREGUI, GUADALUPE vs RUIZ, JUAN FARIAS - Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default & Default Judgment - HEARING REQUIRED. UD-26-000408 - ARCHWAY EAH LL LP vs MORALES, MARICELA - Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default & Default Judgment - HEARING REQUIRED.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share