DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV162809·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing 13 days agoGRANTED

MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al.

Ex Parte Application to Advance the Bobbi Brown PHV for Jack DiSorbo

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 26, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffMENOR
DefendantCHANEL, INC.
DefendantEstee Lauder, Inc.
DefendantThe Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
DefendantBobbi Brown
DefendantClinique Laboratories LLC
DefendantMAC Cosmetics, Inc.
DefendantGabrielle Studio
DefendantDonna Karan

Attorneys

Jack B. DiSorbofor Defendant

Ruling

26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/11/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application to Advance the Bobbi Brown PHV for Jack DiSorbo (CRS #769301977341) CRS# A-162809-034 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/11/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendants Estee Lauder, Inc.; The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.; Bobbi Brown; Clinique Laboratories LLC; MAC Cosmetics, Inc.; Gabrielle Studio; and Donna Karan's Ex Parte Applications for an order shortening time to hear their applications for order granting pro hac vice admission of Kevin B. DiSorbo ("Applicant") is GRANTED. The Applications for Admission substantially comply with the requirements of CRC Rule 9.40 and are GRANTED.

The Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice CRS# 858216249462 scheduled for 10/21/2026, the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice CRS# 982404672506 scheduled for 10/28/2026, the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by ESTEE LAUDER, INC. (Defendant) + CRS# 863266535701 scheduled for 10/28/2026, the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by ESTEE LAUDER, INC. (Defendant) + CRS# 769301977341 scheduled for 10/28/2026, the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice CRS# 812093444047 scheduled for 10/28/2026, the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice CRS# 431461933143 scheduled for 11/05/2026, and the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by ESTEE LAUDER, INC. (Defendant) + CRS# 298825842879 scheduled for 11/05/2026 are advanced to this date and heard.

Pursuant to Government Code section 70617(e)(2), on or before the anniversary of the date of this order Pro Hac Vice Applicant Jack B. DiSorbo (representing Estee Lauder et al.) shall pay a renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that Pro Hac Vice Applicant maintains pro hac vice status in this case. The Court hereby sets a compliance hearing for 08/26/2027 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse. If the renewal fee has been paid at least 10 calendar days before the hearing, no appearance will be required.

Defendant Estee Lauder et al.'s counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 1:30 pm the day of the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share