DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25627978·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoSUSTAINED with final leave to amend

JUNCHAN LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY VS. PATRICK GALLAGHER ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Apr 28, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUNCHAN LLC
DefendantPATRICK GALLAGHER
DefendantDOMINIC DOWLING
DefendantTOM DOUPE
DefendantJONES LANG LASALLE BROKERAGE, INC.
DefendantJONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 28, 2026. Line 6. DEFENDANT DOMINIC DOWLING, TOM DOUPE, JONES LANG LASALLE BROKERAGE, INC., JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with final leave to amend for Plaintiff to allege (1) misrepresentation by each separately named agent; (2) misrepresentation and reasonable reliance in light of the CC&Rs 3.8; the additional contracts for Parking Facility Agreement and Parking License Agreement; and the detailed budget provided to the Plaintiff.

Conclusory allegation in paragraph 24 is not sufficient. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share