Cliq, Inc. vs. Capital Managers, LLC

Accordingly, Defendants may still communicate with workers for the limited purpose as specified in this court’s ruling above.

Undertaking

The court declines to impose an undertaking. (See Wallace v. Miller (1983) 140 Cal.App.3d 636, 645 [“The posting of security is not a prerequisite to the issuance of a valid temporary restraining order.”]).

The Samuel Hale Defendants have not shown any amount of damages that they would sustain by imposition of a Temporary Restraining Order.

Order to Show Cause Re: Issuance of Preliminary Injunction

If the court grans a temporary restraining order, the court must expeditiously set the matter for a hearing on a preliminary injunction. (See, e.g., Code Civ. Proc., § 527, subd. (d).)

This gives the parties time to give proper notice and more fully brief the issues, and gives the court more time to consider the issue. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 527, subd. (a).)

Therefore, the court will set an Order to Show Cause re: Issuance of Preliminary Injunction to allow the parties time to address the issue of a preliminary injunction.

Plaintiffs shall give notice of this ruling.

7 Cliq, Inc. vs. Capital Motions for Attorney’s Fees and Motions to Strike Managers, LLC and/or Tax Costs

The court will hear from the parties regarding the 30-2021-01220754 selection of a referee to prepare a report and make recommendations on the parties’ respective motions for attorney’s fees and motions to strike and/or tax costs.