DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV169921·alameda·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing 13 days agoPlaintiff ordered to appear in person to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

COLLECTRIX vs VERDUCCI

Order to Show Cause regarding sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500.00

Parties

PlaintiffCollectrix
DefendantVerducci

Ruling

26CV169921: COLLECTRIX vs VERDUCCI 08/11/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 19

Tentative Ruling - 08/03/2026 Joscelyn Jones

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

Plaintiff Collectrix is ordered to appear in person in dept. 19 TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS OF $500.00 SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT (PER CRC 3.3.110(B); FAILURE TO FILE A TIMELY CMC STATEMENT (PER CRC 3.725) AND FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE COURT (See CRC 3.1340.).

No timely CMC statement was filed by the Plaintiff in accordance with CRC 3.725. Failure to file a timely CMC statement may be a basis for the imposition of monetary sanctions.

The complaint was filed on 2/13/2026.

THIS ORDER TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19 OVERRIDES THE STANDING ORDER THAT PERMITS REMOTE APPEARANCE BY ZOOM.

RULES FOR CONTESTING THIS TENTATIVE ORDER If a party wishes to contest this Tentative Case Management Order, they must indicate on-line and by emails to Department 19 and all other counsel by 11 a.m. on August 11, 2026. The matter will then be set for an in-person or on-line conference at 3:00 p.m. on either August 11, 2026, or an alternate date. If no party requests such a hearing, the Tentative Order will become final. Dept19@alameda.courts.ca.gov

Unless ordered otherwise, remote appearances by Zoom are the default for all law & motion, case management and compliance hearings in Dept.

19. Remote appearance requires an oncamera appearance by all counsel and/or parties. Every counsel and/or party who appear remotely must have a sufficient WiFi connection for substantial visual and audio connectivity with the Court. Telephone connectivity does not constitute appearance.

The Zoom link for remote appearance in Dept. 19 is: Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16079455282 Meeting ID: 160 7945 5282

Posting of this Zoom link for authorized remote appearance DOES NOT PERMIT REMOTE APPEARANCE BY ZOOM TO COUNSEL AND/OR PARTY WHO HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19. 26CV169921: COLLECTRIX vs VERDUCCI 08/11/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 19 When a MANDATORY in person court appearance is ordered, reliance on this Zoom link information will not be a justification, meritorious argument or good cause excuse for not appearing in person in Dept.

19. An entry in the eCourt Portal of a Contest to this tentative case management order DOES NOT PERMIT ANY COUNSEL TO APPEAR REMOTELY BEFORE THE COURT VIA ZOOM.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share