DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV089313·alameda·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 13 days agoGRANTED IN PART

ARSENITH, et al. vs 3M COMPANY F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al.

Ex Parte Application For Order Shortening Time on Motion for Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Oct 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffARSENITH
Defendant3M COMPANY F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
DefendantJ-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
DefendantPW EAGLE, INC.

Ruling

24CV089313: ARSENITH, et al. vs 3M COMPANY F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al. 08/11/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application For Order Shortening Time on Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. sued individually and as successor-in-interest to J-M A/C PIPE CORPORATION (CRS# 044884070263) CRS# A-89313-024 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/11/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and PW Eagle, Inc.’s Ex Parte Application to Advance the hearings on their Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication (“MSJ/MSA”) is GRANTED IN PART. The applying Defendants requested a hearing date on Friday, October 16, which is not a day that Department 18 hears motions in asbestos cases. Counsel are further reminded to reserve hearings dates in advance to ensure timely filing. (See Yarbrough Decl. ¶ 2.) In this instance, the last day to hear MSJ/MSA in this case consistent with the court’s calendar was October 15, and nine (9) defendants successfully reserved hearing dates on that date in this case. While the court may not grant relief in the future under similar circumstances, the motions will be heard as noticed on October 20, 2026. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(a)(3).)

Defendant J-M Manufacturing Company's counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 12:00 pm the day of the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share