DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV145867·alameda·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 18 days agoGRANTED

GOODLEY vs AECOM, et al.

Ex Parte Application for order shortening time; Application Pro Hac Vice

Hearing date
Aug 6, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 24, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffGOODLEY
DefendantAECOM
DefendantFISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY L.L.C.
DefendantTHERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.

Attorneys

Kyli L. Cottenfor Defendant

Ruling

25CV145867: GOODLEY vs AECOM, et al. 08/06/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application order shortening time for notice and hearing on Defendants’ Application Pro Hac Vice of Kyli L. Cotten CRS# A-145867-011 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/05/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendants Fisher Scientific Company LLC and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.'s ("Fisher") Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time to hear their application for order granting pro hac vice admission of Kyli L. Cotten ("Applicant") is GRANTED. The Application for Admission substantially complies with the requirements of CRC Rule 9.40 and is GRANTED.

The Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY L.L.C. (Defendant) + CRS# 495457866374 scheduled for 09/09/2026 is advanced to this date and heard.

This motion was noticed for hearing on a Wednesday, and counsel are reminded that Law & Motion Hearings and Case Management Conferences are held in asbestos cases on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 1:30 p.m. (See Department 18 Information at https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov/?q=node/397/1152397.) Future filings noticed for hearing on a Wednesday may be subject to being continued to a later date available on the court's calendar or sanctions.

Pursuant to Government Code section 70617(e)(2), on or before the anniversary of the date of this order Pro Hac Vice Applicant Kyli L. Cotten (representing Fisher) shall pay a renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that Pro Hac Vice Applicant maintains pro hac vice status in this case. The Court hereby sets a compliance hearing for 08/24/2027 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse. If the renewal fee has been paid at least 10 calendar days before the hearing, no appearance will be required.

Defendant Fisher's counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share