Richard Chamberlain v. Santa Clara Public Defender’s Office, et. al.
MOTION TO COMPEL
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 08/05/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 23CV420300 Northeast Securities MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE Co., Ltd v. Que, Xiaolan, Lin et al. Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 1 LINE 2-4 23CV428045 Mahmoud Ascarie DEMURRER & MOTION TO STRIKE v. Great American First Amended Complaint was filed on July 23, 2026; as such, Demurrer Assurance Co. et al. (x 2) and Motion to Strike are Off Calendar
LINE 5 24CV431077 Julianne Mejia MOTION: ADMISSIONS DEEMD ADMITTED & SANCTIONS v. The County of Santa Clara Admissions Deemed Admitted: rendered moot by the filing of answers Sanctions: Good cause appearing, Court grants sanctions for two hours reasonable attorney’s fees.
Defendant to prepare the final proposed order, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the hearing. LINE 6 25CV456689 Richard Chamberlain MOTION TO COMPEL v. Santa Clara Public Defender’s Office, Withdrawn by Plaintiff July 24, 2026 et. al. LINE 7 25CV457483 Richard Chamberlain MOTION TO COMPEL v. Jason Chamberlain Moot in light of prior ruling on Motion for Summary Judgement LINE 8 25CV457483 Richard Chamberlain MOTION FOR CONTINGENT RESTORATION AND SCHEDULING v. Jason Chamberlain Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 8 LINE 9 25CV459816 Onemain Financial, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION LLC. Et al. v. Mario Melendez Castro Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 9
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”