MOTION TO COMPEL
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 05/13/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 24CV428752 Lovette Mitchell MOTION: LEAVE TO FILE FAC v. Ronnie Grisham et al Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file First Amended Complaint filed 10/1/2025. No Opposition. Plaintiff moves for an order granting leave to file FAC to augment “Prayer for Relief” and “Parties” section of Complaint. No Opposition has been filed.
(The Court notes Defendant Guard Force Inc’s Notice of Stay of Proceedings (Chapter 7 Bankruptcy) dated 12/16/24)
None of parties have appeared at court hearings on 10/17/25; 3/27/26; 5/13/26.
Plaintiff is ordered to appear at the hearing (in person or remote.) Plaintiff’s non-appearance may result in dismissal of the case.
LINE 2 25CV460776 Robert Bigler et al. MOTION TO COMPEL v. Xie Tan Lee, et al. Settlement agreement pending. Off Calendar LINE 3 25CV466785 JP Morgan Chase Bank MOTION- ANSWERS DEEM ADMITTED N.A v. Daniela A. Mejias Notice is proper. The Court has received no opposition from Defendant. “[T]he failure to file an opposition creates an inference that the motion or demurrer is meritorious.” (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. The truth of all specified facts in the Request for Admissions, Set One, propounded by Plaintiff on Defendant on July 10, 2025 shall be deemed admitted. Plaintiff to prepare the final order that repeats the admissions to be admitted verbatim, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the date of the hearing.
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 05/13/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE 4 25CV470867 Michael Leobo DEMURRER v. Kaiser Permanente et al. Demurrer to the FAC is Unopposed and Sustained with 15 days leave to amend LINE 5 25CV475894 Santa Clara Valley MOTION: ORDER Water District v. The City of San Jose, et Plaintiff Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Motion for Prejudgment al. Possession
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Notice is proper. Unopposed. Good cause appearing, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff to prepare the proposed order, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the hearing. LINE 6 25CV477676 Linda Johnson et al. MOTION: Leave to Amend v. Hanford Hotels Inc. et al. Please control click or scroll down to Line 6 LINE 7 23CV426893 Surface Art MOTION TO COMPEL Engineering, Inc. v. Kent, Kim Please control click or scroll down to Line 7 LINE 8 25CV460776 Robert Bigler et al. MOTION TO COMPEL v. Xie Tan Lee, et al. Settlement agreement pending. Off Calendar 9:01 21CV376210 Ku et al Hearing: Order of Examination v. Herchen et al
- oo0oo -