| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC23277109 - February 10, 2026 Hearing date: February 10, 2026 Case number: CGC23277109 Case title: TIMOTHY DEASY VS. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23277109 | Case Title: | | TIMOTHY DEASY VS. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-10 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, February 10, 2026, for 9:00 AM Department 304, Line 1.
1.DEFENDANT J.S. GUERIN & COMPANY, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant J.S Guerin & Company's ("Defendant" or "JSG") Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Opposition filed. Reply filed. (The court's complete tenetative ruling was e-served to all parties. Please see transaction no. 78428491)
Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on February 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.
The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. =(304/EPS) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”