| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Guardianship review
Case No. PR21-00009 Guardianship of Ballantine, Jed
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Guardian must file GC-251 status report
Case No. PR19-00024 Guardianship of Johnson, Cianna Maureen
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Guardian must file GC-251 status report
Case No. PR13-00020 Guardianship of McKinney, Taylor E., Alexis K.
Tentative Ruling: No Appearance Required: Court has reviewed the updated status report and finds it is in the best interest of the minor for the guardianship to continue. Minor’s 18 th B-day will be in November
Case No. PR20-00000 Guardianship of Meza, Hazely & Meza, Juliyan
Tentative Ruling: No Appearance Necessary: Court finds it is in the best interests of both minors for the guardianship to continue. Set Bi-Annual review on 4/10/28 at 9:00 am
Case No. PR26-00018 In Re Van Fleet Trust Dated October 1, 2014
Tentative Ruling: NO Appearance Required: Absent objection, the court intends to grant the Petition and sign the order.
LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – 9:30 a.m.
Case No. CV23-00168 Bottini, Darin Russell vs. Almanor Recreation & Park et all
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment
Case No. CV24-00154 MINETWORKS, INC. vs. Harms, Isaac et al
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Motion to Seal Declarations; hearing on valuation per Corp. §2000.
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”