Application/Request; Application/Request; Application/Request
Plaintiff Ally Bank’s applications for writ of possession against defendants Feras Khatib, Owen Duckworth, and Rebound IE, LLC are GRANTED.
Plaintiff has established the probable validity of its cause of action for claim and delivery and that plaintiff is entitled to possession of the subject vehicle, consisting of a 2018 Ford Transit 150, VIN 1FMZK1CM7JKA19006. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 512.010 et seq.; see also Molina Decls. ¶¶ 6-13, Exs. A-C; Form CD- 100 Apps. ¶¶ 3-8.)
The Court finds defendants Feras Khatib, Owen Duckworth, and Rebound IE, LLC have no equity/interest in the subject vehicle (see Molina Decls. ¶¶ 9, 10), and therefore waives the requirement of plaintiff’s undertaking. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 515.010, subd. (b).)
If defendants wish to prevent plaintiff from taking/regaining possession of the subject vehicle, defendants must post a counterbond or undertaking in the amount of $38,620.81.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”