DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV038837·alameda·Civil·Case Management / Failure to Serve
Hearing 28 days agoDISMISSED without prejudice

OKPALAUGO vs CHIBUIKE

Compliance Hearing / Dismissal of Action

Hearing date
Jul 28, 2026
Department
15
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffOKPALAUGO
DefendantCHIBUIKE

Ruling

23CV038837: OKPALAUGO vs CHIBUIKE 07/28/2026 Compliance Hearing in Department 15

Tentative Ruling - 07/20/2026 Peter Borkon

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF ACTION

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

The Court has afforded Plaintiff multiple opportunities to serve the complaint and plaintiff has not. Accordingly, the Court will DISMISS this case without prejudice for failure to serve the complaint within 3 years of its filing.

Court orders the entire case dismissed Without Prejudice.

If you contest the tentative ruling you must do so in a timely manner in accordance with the Local Rules. Failure to alert the Court and the opposing side or to appear will result in the Court affirming its tentative ruling. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, no appearance is necessary and the Court's tentative ruling will become a final order of the Court after the hearing.

Counsel must carefully review the order which will set forth the Court's reasoning. Counsel must also review Dept. 15's information page, which contains answers to frequently asked questions, and sets forth guidance for communicating with the department and litigating certain motions and proceedings. This information is available on the eCourt Public Portal at www.eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov under the “Direct Calendaring” tab. If any party contests, the zoom login credentials are:

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-cagov.zoomgov.com/j/16116905917?pwd=SUQrVFJYbTU0VENvVFdoWlduMVNsUT09 Meeting ID: 161 1690 5917 Passcode: 315

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share