DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-23-798529·sf·FamilyLaw·Attorney's Fees and Costs
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Margaret Ellen O'Connell v. Mark Andrew Heitner

Request for Order re: attorney's fees and costs; bifurcation of validity of prenuptial agreement; advance of funds

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2026
Department
404
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMARGARET ELLEN O'CONNELL
RespondentMARK ANDREW HEITNER

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 MARGARET ELLEN O''CONNELL,) Case Number: FDI-23-798529) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 9, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 MARK ANDREW HEITNER,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: ROGER CHAN) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS; AND BIFURCATION OF 13 VALIDITY OF PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT; ADVANCE OF FUNDS 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 The Court has been informed that the parties have an agreement to continue the hearing on Wife’s 16 Request for Order filed 2/13/2026. The parties shall appear in person or by Zoom to select a new 17 date. If a party chooses to appear by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions 18 for Remote Appearance in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 19

23

27

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share