DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV173706·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing about 2 months agoMatter continued for compliance with service requirements per CRC 3.110(b)(1).

BHAGIA vs OLIVAS

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBHAGIA
DefendantOLIVAS

Ruling

26CV173706: BHAGIA vs OLIVAS 06/30/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 06/29/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

Matter appears on calendar this date to check for service of the summons and complaint / answer.

Plaintiff has failed to serve complaint per CRC 3.110(b)(1).

CRC 3.110(b)(1) requires the Summons and Complaint be served on all defendants and proof(s) of service filed with the court within 60 days of filing the complaint. This complaint was filed on MARCH 02, 2026, and proof(s) of service should have been filed by now.

Summons and Complaint must be served and proofs of service filed before the next CMC Statements are due.

Failure to do so may result in an OSC in re DISMISSAL for failure to comply with CRC 3.110(b)(1) and failure to follow the Court's order.

Compliance Hearing answer / service is scheduled for 10/20/2026 at 10:20 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share