DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV162228·alameda·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing 2 months agoThe court orders compliance with Cal. Rule of Court 3.110(b) regarding service of summons and complaint and sets a further Case Management Conference.

MATEO LEON, et al. vs MAGANO

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
20
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 25, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMATEO LEON
PlaintiffDENIA YAMILETH MEJIA LEON
DefendantMAGANO

Attorneys

EUGENE FUfor Plaintiff

Ruling

25CV162228: MATEO LEON, et al. vs MAGANO 06/17/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 20

Tentative Ruling - 06/15/2026 Karin Schwartz

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Management Statements, without a conference.

Plaintiff has not served the complaint and filed proof of service within 60 days of filing the complaint, as required by Cal. Rule of Court 3.110(b). Plaintiff must comply with Cal. Rule of Court 3.110(b) and shall serve the summons and complaint and file the proof of service before the new court date.

FURTHER CONFERENCE A Case Management Conference is scheduled for 08/25/2026 at 03:00 PM in Department 20.

All unserved parties must be served with summons/complaint/cross-complaint, a copy of this order, and proof of service filed with the court.

Updated Case Management Statements must be filed in compliance with Rule of Court 3.725 on Judicial Council Form CM-110.

Unless ordered otherwise, remote appearances by Zoom (videoconference) are permitted for all law and motion, case management hearings, and pretrial hearings in Dept.

20. Trials are held in person unless all parties agree to be remote.

EUGENE FU (Attorney) representing DENIA YAMILETH MEJIA LEON (Plaintiff)+ must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties, and file proof of service. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share