DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV479834·santaclara·ComplexCivil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Ashish Chordia et al vs Chris Jo et al

Application for admission pro hac vice

Hearing date
Jun 24, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAshish Chordia
DefendantChris Jo

Attorneys

Levinfor Moving Party

Ruling

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 24CV432129 Bobadilla v. Loan Factory, Inc. (Class See Line 1 for tentative ruling. Action) LINE 2 24CV439064 Castillo v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. dba See Line 2 for tentative ruling. Earth's Best LINE 3 25CV478939 Edward Carlos, II et al vs Restoration See Line 3 for tentative ruling. Hardware, Inc. et al (Class Action / PAGA) LINE 4 25CV479834 Ashish Chordia et al vs Chris Jo et al Unopposed application for admission pro hac vice of attorney Levin is GRANTED.

No appearance necessary. Court will sign Proposed Order. Case remains on calendar for Case Management Conference at 2:31 p.m. LINE 5 25CV481429 Julianne Spitler vs Match Group, Inc. et al See Line 5 for tentative ruling. Unopposed motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Court will sign proposed Order. No appearance necessary. LINE 6 25CV483219 Herlinda Estrada et al vs Chattem, Inc., Calendar Lines 6 – 19: See individually, as alter ego of, and as Line 6 below for tentative successor-in-interest, et al. rulings.

LINE 7 LINE 8 LINE 9 LINE 10 LINE 11 LINE 12 LINE 13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share