DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV479834·santaclara·ComplexCivil·Other
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Ashish Chordia et al vs Chris Jo et al

Unopposed Application for admission of attorney pro hac vice

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAshish Chordia
DefendantChris Jo

Attorneys

Khawajafor Moving Party
Rusiefor Moving Party
Sternfor Moving Party

Ruling

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 22CV401365 Hathaway v. Alliance Roofing Company, See Line 1 for tentative ruling. Inc. (Class Action) (Lead Case; Consolidated with Case No. 22CV407856] LINE 2 23CV423929 Rubalcaba v. R&L Carriers Shared See Line 2 for tentative ruling. Services, LLC (PAGA) LINE 3 25CV479834 Ashish Chordia et al vs Chris Jo et al Unopposed Application for admission of attorney Khawaja pro hac vice is GRANTED. No appearance necessary. Court will sign proposed Order. LINE 4 25CV479834 Ashish Chordia et al vs Chris Jo et al Unopposed Application for admission of attorney Rusie pro hac vice is GRANTED.

No appearance necessary. Court will sign proposed Order. LINE 5 25CV479834 Ashish Chordia et al vs Chris Jo et al Unopposed Application for admission of attorney Stern pro hac vice is GRANTED. No appearance necessary. Court will sign proposed Order. LINE 6 LINE 7 LINE 8 LINE 9 LINE 10 LINE 11 LINE 12 LINE 13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share