Rachel Bhadare v. Ajmere Singh Dale
Respondent's peremptory challenge
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 RACHEL BHADARE,) Case Number: FDI-26-802819) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 28, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 AJMERE SINGH DALE,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: JERILYN BORACK) 11) 12 TENTATIVE RULING 13 Respondent's peremptory challenge to Judge Luna was granted. The matter is assigned to 14 Department 405A, Judge Carolyn Gold presiding. Appearances required in Department 403 (Assigned 15 Judge Jerilyn Borack presiding) for Respondent's Request to Continue and to schedule future hearing 16 dates in Department 405A. 17 The parties may appear in person in Department 403 or remotely by Zoom video. If a 18 party chooses to appear by video, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions for Remote 19 Appearances in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 20
24
28
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”