DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00318983-CU-BC-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Business Contract
Hearing 10 days agoGRANTED

Balkar Singh Thind vs. Kuldip Singh Sidhu

Motion to continue mandatory settlement conference and trial

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
17A
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jan 5, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBalkar Singh Thind
DefendantKuldip Singh Sidhu

Ruling

34-2022-00318983-CU-BC-GDS: Balkar Singh Thind vs. Kuldip Singh Sidhu 08/14/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A

Tentative Ruling

NOTICE:

*** If oral arguments are requested or appearances are required, the hearing may be conducted in person or remotely via ZoomGov, which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options. No Court Call appearances will be permitted. If you choose to use Zoom you must use your first and last name on your ZoomGov account so the court can positively identify you. The Department 17A ZoomLink is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16173813009 and the ZoomGov ID is: 161 7381 3009. Appearances via videoconference using the above link are preferred. To appear on ZoomGov by phone, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the ZoomGov ID referenced above, available phone commands include *6 to mute/unmute or *9 to raise your hand. If you experience issues joining your hearing, please contact the clerk in Department 17A at (916) 874- 5487 for assistance.

Please take notice that effective April 13, 2026, the Presiding Judge Law & Motion calendar has been moved to Department 17A at the Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse, the Honorable Lawrence G. Brown presiding. The new courthouse is located at 500 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Hon. Lawrence G. Brown Department 17A 916-874-5487 dept17A@saccourt.ca.gov ***

TENTATIVE RULING:

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff Balkar Singh Thind’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to continue mandatory settlement conference and trial is GRANTED.

The Court finds good cause for continuance based on the stipulation and consideration of the factors set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332. The August 18, 2026 Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) and October 5, 2026 trial dates are VACATED.

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, trial is set for January 5, 2027, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 17A. A MSC is set for December 1, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. in Room 450.

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, all statutory deadlines, including discovery and expert

34-2022-00318983-CU-BC-GDS: Balkar Singh Thind vs. Kuldip Singh Sidhu 08/14/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A

discovery, shall be governed by the new trial date.

This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1019.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1312.)

*** This case has been assigned to Department 17A for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 17A. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 12:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If a proper request for hearing is not made, this shall become the order of the Court.

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code section 68086 and California Rules of Court, rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided. ***

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share