DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO1101597·marin·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

RACHEL DENNISON, CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE

Sixth Account and Report of Conservator and Petition for Settlement of Account and Approval of Report

Hearing date
Jun 25, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerAnne F. Smith

Attorneys

Anne F. Smithfor Petitioner

Ruling

PRO1101597 RACHEL DENNISON, CONSERVATORSHIP OFTHE PERSON AND ESTATE

Sixth Account and Report of Conservator and Petition for Settlement of Account and Approval of Report, filed by Anne F. Smith on 4/30/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, this Petition will be granted without hearing. Conservator is ordered to comply with the following future dates: 1. Conservator’s Seventh and Final Account shall be filed by September 3, 2026.

2. A status hearing re filing the Second Account and Report shall be set on September 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.

PRO1403391 KRONGKAEW HUWYLER, CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE

Sixth Account and Report of Conservator of Estate and Petition for Settlement of Account, for Approval of Attorney’s Fees and Costs, for Authority to Transfer Funds to Trust and for Authority to Pay $5,000 per Year for Maintenance of Conservatee’s Home in Thailand, filed by Ampon Plitsch on 4/30/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, this Petition will be granted without hearing. Conservator is ordered to comply with the following future dates: 1. Conservator’s Seventh Account for the period 12/19/25 – 12/18/27 shall be filed by February 3, 2028.

2. A status hearing re filing the Second Account and Report shall be set on February 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 15 | 15

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share