DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025PRDE046021·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL JAMES WILLESEN

Petition for Waiver of Accounting and Final Distribution

Hearing date
Jun 25, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherMichael James Willesen
OtherKarla Weiskopf
OtherShawn Bechard
OtherStephanie Bechard
OtherChuck Morganti

Ruling

2025PRDE046021: IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL JAMES WILLESEN 06/25/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition for Waiver of Accounting and Final Distribution

All persons entitled to distribution from the estate must either waive the final account or execute a written acknowledgment that the person's interest has been satisfied. If adequate provision has been made for satisfaction in full of the person's interest, then a waiver or acknowledgment is not needed. (Prob. Code, § 10954.) No waivers by all persons entitled to distribution are provided. The petition does not demonstrate how adequate provision has been made for full satisfaction of the specific gift beneficiaries.

Subject to full compliance with section 10954, the Court will waive an account. Alternatively, Petitioners may serve and file an account.

The basis for fee computation, when an account is waived, must be included in the petition substantially in the form provided in California Rules of Court, rule 7.705(a). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.705(b).) That section requires the personal representative to state any receipts, gains, and losses. The petition fails to comply.

Petitioners are directed to serve and file a verified supplement addressing the foregoing issues.

Re the notice of hearing, the Court notes that the service list incorrectly identifies Karla Weiskopf, Shawn Bechard, and Stephanie Bechard as “alt beneficiary to Chuck Morganti.” These individuals are beneficiaries of the estate in their own right.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share