REITH v. DARE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS (UNOPPOSED)
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 22, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 26CV01751
COVENANT BROTHERS LLC v. PEREA
MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS (UD)
Parties shall appear.
Based upon tenant’s declaration that she found the summons and complaint at her residence and there is not yet any proof of service of summons filed, the Court intends to grant the motion.
No. 25CV04130
REITH v. DARE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS (UNOPPOSED)
The motion is denied without prejudice. “The papers filed in support of a motion or demurrer must consist of at least the following:”: the motion itself, a notice of hearing on the motion, and a memorandum of points and authorities in support of a motion. (Weil & Brown Civil Proc. Before Trial (TRG 2025) §9:28, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1112(a).) Here, defendant filed a one-page document titled “motion compel responses to special interrogatories and request for production of documents and for monetary sanctions” and a declaration from counsel with attached exhibits but did not file the required notice of motion or a memorandum of points and authorities. Therefore, the Court cannot grant the motion as requested.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”