Capital One, N.A. v. McKinley
Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
avoid such, please log in and test your equipment in advance of the hearing. Also, if technological or audibility issues arise during the proceeding, please call (657) 622-5908.
All remote video participants shall comply with the court’s “Guidelines for Remote appearances”, found at https://www.occourts.org/system/files/guidelinesforremoteproceedings.pdf.
IN-PERSON: Parties preferring to appear in-person for a law and motion hearing may do so, consistent with Section 367.75 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Orange County Local Rule 375.
PUBLIC ACCESS: The courtroom remains open for all evidentiary and non-evidentiary proceedings.
No filming, broadcasting, photography, or electronic recording is permitted of the video session pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 1.150 and Orange County Superior Court rule 180.
June 26, 2026
# Case Name 2 Zardouz vs. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel Medhat F. Mikhael, M.D., Inc.
3 Capital One, N.A. Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice vs. McKinley
4 De Yoo vs. Serenity Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Care Health
5 Yum vs. U.S. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Bancorp
2
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”