DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
21-CLJ-00885·sanmateo·Civil·Contract
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC VS. JOHN ESTALILLA, ET AL

Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Prior Order of Dismissal

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
28
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$20,133.20

Parties

PlaintiffONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
DefendantJOHN ESTALILLA

Attorneys

Ruling

June 17, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________ Case Title / Nature of Case

02:00 PM LINE 1 21-CLJ-00885 ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC VS. JOHN ESTALILLA, ET AL

ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC ROBERT SCOTT KENNARD JOHN ESTALILLA

Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Prior Order of Dismissal

TENTATIVE RULING:

Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to Vacate dismissal and Enter Judgment is GRANTED.

Plaintiff has shown that the parties entered into a “Stipulation of Entry of Judgment” pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, section 664.6, whereby plaintiff would not seek entry of judgment so long as defendant timely made installment payments. Plaintiff has further shown that defendant defaulted under the terms of the stipulation by failing to timely make payment. (Declaration of Michael Mallonga, ¶¶ 3-6, exh. 1-2.)

The court will enter the judgment in favor of plaintiff, filed connection with this motion, in the amount of $20,133.20.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, plaintiffs’ counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share