DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV-0206529·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoAppearance necessary to discuss status.

Ham, et al. v. FCA US, LLC, et al.

Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication

Hearing date
Jun 15, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTaryn Ham
PlaintiffRyan Ham
DefendantFCA US, LLC

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 24CV-0206529 Tentative Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication: Defendant FCA US, LLC moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication. On January 26, 2026, Plaintiffs Taryn and Ryan Ham sought a continuance based on the need for additional discovery, which was granted. The parties selected June 15, 2026, as the new hearing date based on a deposition that was to occur on April 27, 2026. On January 26, 2026, the Court included in its tentative ruling that the Court expected that an Amended Opposition and Amended Reply would be filed. Neither have been filed. An appearance by both parties is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss the status of the motion.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. VS. RENSHAW

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share