DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV094145·alameda·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing about 2 months agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED. Plaintiff ordered to file Notice of Settlement; parties must appear and report status.

PRITCHARD vs FCA US, LLC., et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2026
Department
517
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPritchard
DefendantFCA US, LLC.

Ruling

24CV094145: PRITCHARD vs FCA US, LLC., et al. 06/30/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 517

Tentative Ruling - 06/26/2026 Keith Fong

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. At the 6/11/2026 CMC, specially appearing counsel for Plaintiff had no substantive information regarding the status of the case. Defense counsel logged on late, after the Court had called the case, and informed the court that the case had settled via an accepted 998 Offer. Plaintiff was ordered to file a Notice of Settlement forthwith, which he has failed to do. Parties shall appear and be fully informed as to the status of the case.

ZOOM LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR DEPARTMENT 517 IS BELOW.

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16181989812

Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812 One tap mobile +16692545252,,16181989812# US (San Jose) 16692161590,,16181989812# US +(San Jose)

IF APPEARING BY ZOOM, VIDEO MUST BE ENABLED. THE COURT DOES NOT ALLOW APPEARANCES BY PHONE WITHOUT PRIOR LEAVE OF COURT.

Dial by your location +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose) +1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose) +1 551 285 1373 US +1 646 828 7666 US (New York) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812 Find your local number: https://www.zoomgov.com/u/ad6x1ZH23d

Join by SIP 16181989812@sip.zoomgov.com

Join by H.323 161.199.138.10 (US West) 161.199.136.10 (US East) Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share