DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPG13-0027399·shasta·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing 3 months agoIntends to GRANT

CONSERVATORSHIP OF RYAN LONG

Petition for Removal of Conservator; Petition for Appointment of a Successor Conservator of the Person

Hearing date
Jun 8, 2026
Department
44
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Oct 5, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherRyan Long

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVPG13-0027399 This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Removal of Conservator and Petition for Appointment of a Successor Conservator of the Person. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. The Citation has been filed with proper proof of service. Counsel has been appointed for the Conservatee. No objections have been raised. The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed April 27, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition.

The report states that the Conservatee is unable to attend the hearing. The Court intends to GRANT the Petitions, absent an appearance and objection as noted below. Proposed Orders were submitted and will be executed. The matter will be set for Monday, October 5, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for confirmation of filing the Proof of Service of Notice of Conservatee’s Rights (Form GC-341) and Conservatorship Care Plan (GC-355/GC-356). The hearing currently set for May 1, 2028, for Biennial Review is hereby VACATED.

The matter is set for Monday, June 7, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for Annual Review. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar only if there is an objection by the Public Defender’s office.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MAGUIRE MCLEOD

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share