DecisionDepot
California legal research
All judges

William E. Weinberger

LA · 12 rulings ingested

Compare to another judge
Ruling distribution
12
rulings
Granted33%
Denied25%
Continued8%
Other33%
Prevailing party
5
determined
Plaintiff0%
Defendant40%
Mixed60%
At a glance
Grant rate33%
Denial rate25%
Continuance rate8%
First seenMay 18, 2026
Most recentAug 21, 2026

Motion type breakdown

Other
6
Motion for Summary Judgment
2
Motion for Summary Adjudication
2
Demurrer
1
Motion to Compel Further Responses
1
Motion to Strike
1
Petition
1
Granted
Denied
Continued
Other
Statewide patterns:Motions for Summary Judgment →Motions for Summary Adjudication (MSA) →Demurrers →Demurrers to Answer / Cross-Complaint →Motions to Compel Discovery →Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses →Motions to Strike →

Recent rulings

CaseCountyMotionRulingIndexedHearing
24STCV16130
PATRICIA EASON vs DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE, A C...
la
Civil		Motion for summary judgment/summary adjudicationMotion for Summary Judgment is denied. Motion for Summary Adjudication is granted as to Sixth, Seventh, Tenth Causes of Action and punitive damages; denied as to First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth Causes of Action.Aug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
25STCV28683
Jin Kim v. Young Joo Park
la
Civil		Request for default judgmentDENIEDAug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
25STCV02756
Antwuan Anthony Gordon v. Smart & Final Store, LLC
la
Civil		Motion to Compel ArbitrationGRANTEDAug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
25STCV11056
Henry Jin v. BMW of North America, LLC
la
Civil		Motion for judgment on the pleadingsGranted as to the second, third and fourth causes of action, with 20 days' leave to amend. Denied as to the first cause of action.Aug 20, 2026Aug 20, 2026
25STLC01722
LIQIN PENG, et al. vs RYAN MICHAEL BURKE
la
Civil		Demurrer TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINTOVERRULEDAug 14, 2026Aug 14, 2026
22STCV01858
SARAH NAZARI, et al. vs SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL INC...
la
Civil		Motion to compel further re: biotesting rfps, set oneGranted in part, Denied in part.Aug 14, 2026Aug 14, 2026
23STCV12697
CHRISTINE ROBLES, et al. vs MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, ...
la
Civil		Motion for summary judgment; Motion for summary adjudicationDENIEDAug 14, 2026Aug 14, 2026
26STCV13078
New Century Building Supplies, Inc., et al. v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
la
Civil		Motion to StrikeGRANTED with leave to amendAug 14, 2026Aug 14, 2026
24STCV13085
McKesson Corp. Retail – West v. Century Beverly Hills Pharmacy Inc., et al.
la
FamilyLaw		request for default judgmentThe hearing is continued to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to correct the issues noted above.May 18, 2026May 18, 2026
22STCV34285
Aubrey v. Ochoa
la
Civil		Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Failure to Enter Default JudgmentDENIEDMay 18, 2026May 18, 2026
24STCV13085
McKesson Corp. Retail – West v. Century Beverly Hills Pharmacy Inc., et al.
la
Civil		request for default judgmentCONTINUEDMay 18, 2026May 18, 2026
22STCV34285
Aubrey v. Ochoa
la
FamilyLaw		Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Failure to Enter Default JudgmentThe Request for Default Judgment is denied. The Court continues the Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Failure to Enter Default Judgment, to ______________, 2026.May 18, 2026May 18, 2026

Frequently asked questions

What is Judge William E. Weinberger's grant rate in California Superior Court?+

Based on 12 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge William E. Weinberger has a 33% grant rate (25% denial rate, 8% continued). Counties active: LA.

What kinds of motions does Judge William E. Weinberger hear most often?+

The most common motion type in Judge William E. Weinberger's indexed rulings is Other. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.