DecisionDepot
California legal research
All judges

Karine Mkrtchyan

LA · 11 rulings ingested

Compare to another judge
Ruling distribution
11
rulings
Granted27%
Denied55%
Continued9%
Other9%
Prevailing party
4
determined
Plaintiff25%
Defendant50%
Mixed25%
At a glance
Grant rate27%
Denial rate55%
Continuance rate9%
First seenAug 18, 2026
Most recentAug 21, 2026

Motion type breakdown

Ex Parte Application
4
Other
3
Motion to Compel Further Responses
1
Petition
1
Motion to Quash
1
Demurrer
1
Motion to Strike
1
Granted
Denied
Continued
Other
Statewide patterns:Motions to Compel Discovery →Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses →Motions to Quash →Demurrers →Demurrers to Answer / Cross-Complaint →Motions to Strike →

Recent rulings

CaseCountyMotionRulingIndexedHearing
25STCV23413
Clark v. Notting Hill Music (UK), et al.
la
Civil		Motion to Quash Service of SummonsGRANTED as to the request to quash the 5/20/26 Proof of Service.Aug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
24STCV19188
Givens v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
la
Civil		Motion for Protective OrderDENIED. The Court imposes $250.00 in sanctions against defense counsel.Aug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
24STCV29325
GLOBAL NETWORK INVESTMENTS, LLC v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
la
Civil		Ex Parte Application to ConsolidateDENIEDAug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
26STCV13556
Kamyar Moshfegh vs. Orville Swanston
la
Civil		Ex Parte Application for an Order to Consolidate or Alternatively Shorten TimeDENIEDAug 21, 2026Aug 21, 2026
24STCV32770
Parisa Bazgir v. Integon Preferred Insurance Company et. al.
la
Civil		Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an order resetting the discovery and motion cut-offDENIEDAug 20, 2026Aug 20, 2026
25STCV25867
ABLE INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC v. CHRISTAIN COPELIN
la
Civil		Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to specially set and advance hearing dateDENIEDAug 20, 2026Aug 20, 2026
26STCV14366
Luban Z Construction Corp. v. Nexus Urban Development LLC, et al.
la
Civil		Demurrer to the Complaint; Motion to StrikeDemurrer SUSTAINED WITH 30 DAYS' LEAVE TO AMEND; Motion to Strike GRANTEDAug 20, 2026Aug 20, 2026
23STCV16635
Di Bona Ventura, et al. v. Lachman, et al.
la
Civil		Motion to Substitute DefendantCONTINUEDAug 18, 2026Aug 19, 2026
24STCV29622
Syal v. My 6 Angeles, Inc., et al.
la
Civil		MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSGRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PARTAug 18, 2026Aug 18, 2026
26STCV06397
Brot Gross Fishbein LLP v. Taverniti
la
Civil		Default Judgment PacketDENIEDAug 18, 2026Aug 18, 2026
24STCV28646
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Co., et al. v. Spriggs, et al.
la
Civil		MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND ALL TRIAL RELATED DATESGRANTEDAug 18, 2026Aug 18, 2026

Frequently asked questions

What is Judge Karine Mkrtchyan's grant rate in California Superior Court?+

Based on 11 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge Karine Mkrtchyan has a 27% grant rate (55% denial rate, 9% continued). Counties active: LA.

What kinds of motions does Judge Karine Mkrtchyan hear most often?+

The most common motion type in Judge Karine Mkrtchyan's indexed rulings is Ex Parte Application. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.